Our journal follows the Double-Blind Peer Review Policy, in which both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous. Under this policy, we ensure that all reviews are conducted impartially, independently, and based on scientific principles. There is no exchange of personal information between authors and reviewers, preserving the transparency and fairness of the review process.

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

In Double-Blind Peer Review, the identities of both the author and the reviewer remain concealed from each other. The process works as follows:

Selection of Manuscripts for Review:

After passing initial screening, the manuscript is sent for review.

The manuscript is kept completely confidential, and the author’s name and other personal details are hidden from the reviewers.

Selection of Reviewers:

We select high-quality experts to review the manuscripts.

Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise, research area, and experience.

Reviewers are given a few weeks to complete their review.

Review Process:

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on its scientific rigor, novelty, originality, and contribution to the field.

Reviewers provide their suggestions and comments, but the author’s identity is never disclosed to them.

The reviewers’ feedback remains confidential and is visible only to the editorial team.

Decision and Revisions:

Based on the reviewers’ suggestions, the manuscript may be accepted, revised, or rejected.

If revisions are required, the author is asked to make necessary improvements based on the reviewers’ comments.

Impartiality and Confidentiality:

The main goal of our Double-Blind Peer Review Policy is to maintain impartiality and confidentiality so that no bias or external influence affects the review process.

This ensures that authors receive a fair evaluation of their research work, and the journal’s reputation is upheld.

We Follow the Double-Blind Peer Review System.

Our journal adheres to the Double-Blind Peer Review system, which ensures that both the author’s and the reviewer’s identities are kept confidential. This policy provides us the freedom to review papers impartially and with a scientific approach. Our priority is to promote high-quality research content and ensure accurate evaluation.